Morocco or Argentina for landscapes?

For raw, knock-you-flat natural grandeur, Argentina is hard to top, and I'll say so honestly: Patagonia's glaciers and granite peaks, the thundering Iguazú Falls, the Andes and Mendoza's high-altitude vineyards, the lake district and the pampas — these are world-class, bucket-list landscapes on an epic scale. If your trip is fundamentally about standing slack-jawed in front of nature at its most monumental, Argentina has set-pieces Morocco can't rival for sheer wow-per-view.

The honest trade-off is size and effort. Argentina is huge — the distances between Patagonia, Iguazú and the wine country are continental, almost always meaning internal flights and a longer, pricier, more logistically involved trip, and a long-haul flight to get there in the first place. The payoff is spectacular, but it's a big undertaking, and you spend real time and money simply moving between the highlights rather than among them.

Morocco's landscape story is about variety and accessibility rather than singular scale. In one road trip you cross the golden ergs of the Sahara, climb the snow-capped High Atlas, walk the dramatic Todra and Dades gorges, see palm oases and kasbahs, and end on the windswept Atlantic — an extraordinary range of terrain in a country small enough to traverse in a week or two. No internal flights, modest cost, and a three-to-four-hour hop from Europe. It's not that Morocco out-grands Patagonia; it's that Morocco hands you four or five distinct landscapes back-to-back with almost no friction.

So my steer: if you want the planet's most jaw-dropping single landscapes and you've got the time, budget and appetite for a big, flight-heavy trip, Argentina is breathtaking and absolutely worth it. If you want remarkable landscape variety — desert, mountains, gorges and coast — woven into one compact, affordable, easy-to-reach journey, Morocco is wonderfully efficient and endlessly photogenic. Choose Argentina for grandeur; choose Morocco for variety and ease.